Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00055
Original file (PD 2013 00055.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD-2013-00055
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140429
SEPARATION DATE: 20080822


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (92M/Mortuary Affairs Specialist) medically separated for a chronic low back condition. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The chronic low back condition, characterized as “chronic low back pain, EPTS with service aggravation” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB forwarded no other conditions to the PEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain” as unfitting and rated it at 10%. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting chronic low back condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20080624
 VA - (50 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Low Back Pain 5242 10% Degenerative Disk Disease of the Lumbar Spine 5242 10% 20121024
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 5 20121024
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 40%*
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20 120226 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).
* Combined disability rating was 20% from 20080823 then 40% from 20120327 (lumbar spine rating remained 10%).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Low Back Pain Condition. The service treatment records show a history of chronic low back pain (LBP) since falling 7 feet from an obstacle during war transition training in April 2007. X-rays of the lumbar spine, in August and November 2007, showed no evidence of an acute injury (fracture, dislocation). They demonstrated congenital change at the L5–S1 junction (partial sacralization of L5; incomplete segmentation during development), with a large L5 transverse process making contact with the sacrum on the left (can be a cause for pain). Magnetic resonance imaging, in November 2007, showed minimal degenerative disc disease with a possible internal disc disruption between lumbar segment five and sacral segment one. There was no evidence of disc herniation, central stenosis or lateral stenosis. The physical profile on 11 March 2008 (L3), advised limitation from strenuous military activities (including moving with fight load 2 miles, constructing an individual fighting position, rushes under direct or indirect fire, marching, fitness test, etc.) and lifting more than 20 pounds. The MEB narrative summary examination dated 11 March 2008 documented chronic LBP not responsive to conservative therapy. The CI reported that pain was exacerbated to 9/10 pain with physical training (running, push-ups, etc.), lifting and load bearing. He denied a history of lower extremity numbness, tingling or weakness. On examination, the CI demonstrated normal posture, gait, muscle strength and reflexes. The visual examination of the spine revealed normal motion, contour (thoracic and lumbar curvature) and showed no back spasms or scoliosis. Palpation demonstrated left paraspinal muscles tenderness. Dynamic testing revealed bilateral sacroiliac joint pain with forward flexion. Straight leg raise exhibited tight hamstrings with distal hamstring pain and tenderness (but no signs of radiculopathy). The 13 June 2008 physical therapy MEB examination documented completely normal thoracolumbar active range-of-motion (ROM) measurements: flexion 90 degrees (normal 90), extension 30 degrees (normal 30), right and left lateral bending 30 degrees (normal 30) and right and left rotation 30 degrees (normal 30). There was no decrease in ROM after repetitive movement. No muscle spasm, altered contour or abnormal gait was reported. The physical therapist recorded reports of back pain occurring once per day lasting 2 hours and interfering with work. The commander's evaluation letter on 4 April 2008, cited that because of his medical condition and the duty limiting profile, the CI was unable to perform the duties required by his primary MOS, basic duties of a Soldier, or deployments. The first post-separation VA examination in evidence was performed on 24 October 2012, 4 years after separation. Thoracolumbar flexion was 75 degrees with a combined ROM of 225 degrees.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the unfitting chronic LBP 10% (coded 5242, degenerative arthritis of the spine) with application of the VASRD general rating formula for diseases and injuries of the spine. The VA rated the back condition 10% based on the VA C&P examination 4 years after separation. The Board noted that the VA C&P examination carried little probative value for rating the condition at the time of separation due to the long elapsed period of time. The ROM at the time of the MEB examination was completely normal and did not attain a minimum rating; however there was tenderness and functional loss supportive of the 10% rating adjudicated by the PEB. There was no muscle spasm causing altered gait or spinal contour to support consideration of a 20% rating. There was no peripheral nerve involvement due to disc disease for consideration of a separately unfitting rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic LBP condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the chronic LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130131, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record



                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20140020588 (PD201300055)
I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01837

    Original file (PD-2013-01837.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20040610VA -(STR) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Low Back Pain without Neurologic Abnormality5299-523710%Degenerative Disc Disease of the Lumbar Spine at L5 (claimed as chronic low back pain)524210%STROther x 0Other x 1 Rating: 10%Combined Rating: 10%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20041026 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02230

    Original file (PD-2013-02230.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The VA rated the low back condition at 20% coded 5243 (intervertebral disc syndrome), based on decreased forward flexion of 50 degrees (no greater than 60 degrees). DoD Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02852

    Original file (PD-2014-02852.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. IAW DoDI 6040.44, this Board must consider the appropriate rating for the CI’s back condition at separation based on the VASRD standards in effect at the time of separation. Under the 5292 code a 20% rating is...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD2014 00906

    Original file (PD2014 00906.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VARD also noted the absence of radicular findings and no recording of ROM (the CI refused testing).The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence.The PEB rated the condition for ROM limited by pain, coded 5237, and assigned a rating of 0%.The VA rated the condition under code 5242, 10% for muscle spasm.Under the applicable spine rules, a rating of 10% requires cervical spine flexion of greater than 30 degrees but less than 40 degrees or a combined...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02240

    Original file (PD-2013-02240.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Low Back and Left Leg Pain Condition. Despite additional treatment the CI continued to report primarily back pain with some numbness/tingling to the left thigh area, but was noted to have good strength, sensation and reflexes.A repeat myelogram did not indicate any further nerve compression and no further surgical intervention was recommended.At the MEB examination performed on 9 March 2005, approximately 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported chronic pain increased by activity and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01886

    Original file (PD-2013-01886.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The chronic LBP, characterized as “chronic uncomplicated low back pain (slight/intermittent),” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic subjective low back pain, without neurologic abnormality”as unfitting, rated 10% with likely application of theVA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The examination noted limited painful extension and normal flexion,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00935

    Original file (PD 2012 00935.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was then medically separated with a 10% disability rating. A normal gait and stance were present, and there was no lumbar spine tenderness or muscle spasm. At a clinic visit for refill of narcotic pain medication 3 months prior to separation, the examiner noted an “altered gait.” A final orthopedic follow-up examination 2 months prior to separation noted the CI to be in moderate distress with generalized tenderness throughout the lower lumbar spine.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01278

    Original file (PD2012 01278.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB coded the back condition utilizing the 2002 VASRD rating rules as 5299-5295, analogous to lumbosacral strain and citing DoDI 1332.39 and AR 635-40.The VA rating of 40% was under the current VASRD §4.71a rating code of 5242 (degenerative arthritis of the spine) which was not in effect at the time of the CI’s date of separation.The spine specific VA examination (6 months after separation) demonstrated significantly worse symptoms and ROMs than the general VA exam (near separation) and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01825

    Original file (PD-2013-01825.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Low Back Pain, without Neurologic Abnormality5299-523710%Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease (claimed as chronic low back pain)5243-524210%20040622No Additional MEB/PEB Entries Combined: 10%Combined: 10%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20041027 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). Having normal muscle tone and strength coupled with a normal gait, neurosurgery recommended work restrictions and self-paced...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01816

    Original file (PD-2013-01816.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander’s statement noted that the CI’s back condition precluded him from performing critical field tasks, his condition further interfered with his MOS duties and adversely affected his unit’s readiness.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) exam approximately 5 monthsprior to separation documented that the CI was seen in the ER on 3 October 2003 and given intravenous morphine for acute LBP and that he still had occasional moderate LBP. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends...